The Self-Adjusting-File (SAF) Technique

The Self-Adjusting-File (SAF) Technique

ITALIAN VERSION

Introduction

 

In 1993 the first  endodontic files, made from a nickel-titanium (NiTi) alloy,  were introduced to the dental market and definitely contributed to a radical change in the operative approach to endodontic treatment   [1]. Compared to  previous stainless steel  files, they were much more flexible,  effective and better performing in shaping   root canals. Furthermore, in recent years, advances in knowledge and technology  have  brought about  several  interesting changes in these alloys, which were made increasingly resistant to  torsional load and, therefore, safer to use.This has led to the manufacturing of  a “single file” ,  which  enables dental practitioners to shape the full length of the root canal using a single  instrument, such as  Wave One ® (Maillefer- Dentsply , Ballaugues, Switzerland) or Reciproc ® (VDW, Munich, Germany) [2].Despite these structural improvements, the file design has remained unchanged :  a solid body with more or less sharpened blades, which cut the canal from different angles and  collect treatment debris in their flutes. This suggests that, despite the different endodontic  variations recurrent in nature, we do nothing but imprint the instrument shape inside the canal, regardless  canal anatomy ; this apparently allows us  to use similar procedures with either round-shaped  and oval- shaped canals ,  as well as with  more or less tightly curved canals.From the studies carried out by  Paqué [3,] analyzing  MicroCT  sections, it is clear  that instrumentation with conventional Ni-Ti tools   does not allow  us to accomplish  a proper cleaning of the whole root canal system (fig.1). In fact, these instruments, due to their  shape, cannot contact the entire surface  of root  walls, thus  leaving within a certain amount of unremoved tissue, which also reduces the quality of subsequent obturation ,  as  highlighted by De Deus (Fig2) [4.5].

pasted-image-133

Fig. 1 – Adapted from Paquè et Al

Adapted from DeDeus et Al.

Fig. 2 – Adapted from DeDeus et Al.

The search for more effective instruments has consequently led to  the manufacturing of files with increasingly  “active” cutting edges,  resulting in greater amounts of treatment debris, as well as  greater  stress in the dentin, which may cause  “micro-cracks” within roots . These are likely to provoke actual root cracks at first , and possible vertical fractures thereafter [6,7,8,9].The  introduction  of the SAF® (Self Adjusting File, Redent Nova, Israel), in 2010,  marked   a new definition of the concept of 3D shaping, cleaning and maintenance of  endodontium anatomy, thanks to an approach which is  completely different from the past.Nowadays,  the assertion  that  endodontic treatment is safer and less  invasive  than in the past, can be confirmed by over 50 studies published in leading international scientific journals, and by a  growing number of clinical applications.

 

The SAF System

 

1.THE FILE

The SAF is the first endodontic file with a hollow tube and not characterized by a solid metal core. As a matter of fact, it consists of a hollow cylinder with two parallel longitudinal beams held together by a Nickel- Titanium lattice; the manufacturing process is not performed using carving techniques, but sand-blasting induced roughening.The working part has no flutes, but only a rough surface that ensures a gentle and effective action of grinding and smoothing the root. (Fig 3).

The  hollow core, letting   liquid flow within,  facilitates debris  removal with  continuous irrigation flow. This takes place thanks to the  small connector,  placed on the shaft of the instrument and attached to an endodontic motor (Fig.4), equipped with a peristaltic pump (Endostation ®, Redent Nova, Israel) that provides  continuous and pre- calibrated(4ml / min)  flow of irrigant solution [10,11,12].

SAF_25mm-20

Fig. 3

image56-22

Fig. 3

Schermata 2015-05-29 alle 15.47.18

Fig. 4

A  peculiar hollow design, gives  the SAF specific features, such as compressibility along root canals. In fact, the diameter size of a  standard instrument is 1,5mm, but if fully compressed, it is reduced to the size of a 0.20  manual K-file. If instead,  it is inserted into a oval-shaped canal with mesio-distal diameter of 0.2mm,, the SAF stretches  bucco-lingually to an extent of  2.4 mm, thus succeeding in coming in  contact  with a large portion of the inner surface of the canal. This happens regardless of the operator being aware of the oval canal , since  the file itself adjust to it (hence the name of Self-Adjusting -File) [10].

Its  particularly flexible structure, makes the SAF a very safe and reliable instruments with  regard to fractures.

In fact, its hollow Ni-Ti lattice  enables it to twist , but even if  detachment  from the grip occurs, the instrument does not get locked in the canal, but can be easily removed used a simple Headstrom file, since it has no blades. This, however, is a rather rare occurrence; it is more likely  that, when mechanically damaged while being used, small pieces  may come off the net  (fig.5) , flow directly into the liquid leaking from the canal, and then into the aspirator.

The file is assembled on a RTD3 headpiece (Fig.6) which performs a dual function: it turns the rotation motion of the motor into an up-and-down motion of the  instrument shaft with  0.4 mm amplitude, and also generates a rotation in absence of torque, when the file is free from the canal [10,11,13].

From a clinical perspective,  this makes it possible for the SAF to performed in-out movements, changing its circular position each time, thus exerting a dentinal smoothing action, which affects nearly 80% of the canal surface (compared to 50%  with normal rotary or reciprocating instrumentation  ) [13,14].

Fig. 5

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 6

 

2. NO-PRESSURE IRRIGATION

The handpiece is operated by an Endostation® endomotor at a speed of 5000 rpm. The latter is equipped also with a peristaltic pump which injects the irrigant solution into  the polyethylene tube connected to the instrument (at a flow rate of 4ml per min), and consequently inside the canal through the hollow file. This way, the irrigant solution, due to the peculiar shape of the instrument is able to reach the LDL,  making it possible to disinfect and clean the endodontium continuously throughout the  treatment. The irrigant  flow has no pressure, which   makes  the system very safe  against possible  discharge of hypochlorite beyond the apex.

This allows us to prevent extrusions caused by improper use of syringes  ( positive pressure procedures), or from turning to negative pressure procedures (Endovac®, SybronEndo)  which, despite being undoubtedly effective, requires substantial enlargement of the canal #40 or #45 to be effective which its used in curved canals where it do not always make it possible for  a  cannula to get as far as the desired  length without risking the integrity of the curved root [15,16].

If all  is related to the back-and-forth motion while working , it is well clear how  liquid can constantly flow from the canal  carrying all debris, and ensure, at the same time,  a continuous  renewal of fresh fully active sodium hypochlorite solution in apex . This turn-over occurs every 30 seconds,

therefore 8 times during a recommended  four-minute treatment ,  without the least extrusion of liquid fromthe apex of the tooth [12].

The synergistic action of irrigation and   “scrubbing” on the canal walls, ensures a safe cleaning of the endodontium,  producing no treatment debris (which is removed as a suspended powder with the liquid coming out from the canal),  without needing to use external accessories to increase the efficacy of  irrigants themselves. We should not forget that canal anatomy is an important factor conditioning the use of certain  irrigation procedures; let us keep in mind that it is difficult to perform a  passive ultrasonic irrigation  in areas with curved roots, owing to stopping the ultrasonic vibration beyond the point at which the ultrasonic file touches the canal wall at the curvature; the  same applies to negative irrigation procedures. In this case, in order to be absolutely effective,  40#.04   or 40#0.6 apical diameter sizes are to be reached  [17], which,  in  curved canals, might  be excessive or even risky [9,18,19].

SEM studies (Fig7) have shown that the cleaning  obtainable  in the middle  and coronal third is in accordance  to that obtainable with conventional rotary instruments when used with syringe and needle irrigation. The apical third is the most inaccessible area where even the use of EDTA cannot remove treatment debris and smear layer properly, thus often leaving the area uncleaned; in this case the use of the SAF, with continuos irrigation has shown absence of debris on the walls in all cases and absence of smear layer in 65% of the apical part of the treated samples, which resulted  clean [20,21,22]. These characteristics make the SAF the only instrument with chemo-mechanical effect in the apical part of even curved canals.

pasted-image-36

Fig. 7 – Adapted from Lin et Al

 

3. 3-D SHAPING AND CLEANING

We usually consider “satisfactory” a root canal treatment based on observing a 2D image, such as an intraoral Rx , but this allows us to understand very little with regard to real dental anatomy. Studies using Micro-CT, have shown that  an oval-shaped root canal anatomy  is rarely  completely affected by preparation using traditional rotary or reciprocating files, in spite of the nice Rx that may be produced. The same applies to complex roots such  as the mesial of the lower molars or upper premolars [23,24,25,39]. Paqué research has shown that in treating the distal root of the lower molar with rotary instruments (Pro-Taper®, Dentsply), approximately 69% of the canal surfaces not changedwith the rotating action of the above mentioned instruments [13,27]

A similar study,  carried out after the release of the SAF, shows a 23% residual percentage of untreated surface. [25]. This  is certainly not an “idealt”, result  but it is much more closer to  the objective of our therapy.

Further studies were carried out, in order to prove that rotating files can also reach the above mentioned figures ; they showed that, unless we want to completely decoronate the tooth, or use  overly aggressive instruments, which remove much healthy dentin from the canal (Versiani et al [28]), the SAF  is the only file capable of coming in contact with  the larger portion of the canal.

Its unique adaptability, makes   the SAF  particularly suitable also for treating   C-Shaped canals , (Fig.8) [29], as well as   curved canals,  where a  good contact  with the perimeter of the canal walls can be achieved, ensuring a minimum loss of dentin and reduced  apical foramen transportation (Figure 9) [13,14,23].

Fig. 8 - Adapted from Solomonov et Al

Fig. 8 – Adapted from Solomonov et Al

Fig. 9 - Adapted from Peters et Al

Fig. 9 – Adapted from Peters et Al

Furthermore, the possibility of having a major cleaning action, allows us to reach areas such as those of the isthmus, which we never manage to reach, but where, as we are all aware, removal of the residual tissue is fundamental. Compressibility allows the SAF to pass even through  isthmus of 0.2mm diameter size,  below which removal action  is possible only with the use of  irrigants.

Studies by Paqué (Fig10) [30,31] have shown that  the rotational motion of  conventional Ni-Ti instruments tends to actively pack debris into canal isthmus or  recesses.

In these areas, where  pulp or bacteria residues may be found, the cleaning out of such packed debris by  files and hypochlorite is nearly impossible, and, as highlighted by  Paqué himself[31,] even  the action of  ultrasounds fails to clean out 50% of the packed debris.  All this, of course, results in   decreased cleaning ability and reduced obturation effectiveness [4,32,33,34].

pasted-image-42

Fig. 10 – Adapted from Paquè et Al

Having no cutting action, but working  with a filing and scrubbing  motion, the SAF produces dentin powder ( rather than larger cut particles) which is conveyed by the hypochlorite irritant flow into the file and then outside the canal [10,11,12]. Moreover, studies with micro-CT, have shown  that canals treated with the SAF system display radiopaque debris in  only 1.7% of  volume of the isthmus compared to 10.1%  reported in those  treated with conventional instruments.

As further below explained,  when dealing with  obturation,  this results in  a greater adaptability of  gutta-percha to  canal walls  and, consequently, in  better sealing.[34]

Fig. 11 - Adapted from Siquera et Al

Fig. 11 – Adapted from Siquera et Al

As for disinfection effectiveness, there are numerous studies on canals infected with E Faecalis or bacterial biofilms. These  have showed the SAF ability to eliminate a higher percentage of bacterial content from  canals, especially those with  particularly complex anatomies, which are hardly  cleanable  with the use of  instruments that, despite being  flexible, cannot  enter the deepest canal recesses (Fig11) [32,35]

 

4. RESPECT THE REMAINING ROOT STRUCTURE

In 2003 Peters’ studies [23] had already shown that the use of Ni-Ti rotary instruments  caused canal transportation, by the Pro-Taper file system (Figure 9). This causes  loss of original anatomy and subtraction of what is defined  as “sound dentine”.

Straightening the curves of S-shaped canals also tends to distort  the natural shape of the canal, and in certain anatomical sites (i.e. mesial roots of lower molars ), there is a  greater risk of provoking stripping or thinning of dentine in  areas most at risk.

The SAF works by removing evenly a thin layer of dentine from canal perimeter walls,  in absolute respect of the original anatomy.

On the other hand, this does not result in  a lower effectiveness of the instrument, on the contrary, Metzger studies in 2010 [33],  showed   how the SAF accomplishes a closer contact  with canal  walls, compared  to a NiTi rotary instrument. Apart from the risk of modifying the root canal system, it is clear how an excessive removal of dentine may result in a reduction of the ability of the root to endure  stress, thus resulting in  micro-cracks, that may lead to real vertical root fractures. Therefore,  even though  an excessive enlargement of the canal was considered favorably in the past ,with regard to  cleaning possibility, nowadays it  proves  counterproductive [36]

Several studies have been carried out in this direction, either on extracted teeth [6,23,27] and  through  finite element computerized analysis [19].  From all these studies, it is clear how  torques exerted by  Ni-Ti instruments  on the canal walls may result in  dentinal cracks (Fig.12) and that,  varying instrument diameters ,  forces increase considerably. From Kim’s study [19] it can be inferred that a Pro-Taper® can  exert  98 to 386 MPa torsional force, depending on whether we refer to an F1 or F3, respectively compared to 10 MPa exercised by a SAF (fig13).

Fig. 12 - Adapted fromYoldas et Al

Fig. 12 – Adapted fromYoldas et Al

Fig. 13 - Adapted fromKim et Al

Fig. 13 – Adapted fromKim et Al

This fundamental dissimilarity lies in the action of the blades  that cut the dentin ( which are completely absent in the SAF) and in  rotation force, with often high torque, exerted by conventional engines. The possibility of using engines and instruments with reciprocating motion may potentially ensures lower stress on canal walls  (as well as on the instrument), however it is not comparable to an instrument  working in  absence of torsion.

To date, there are no clinical studies “in vivo”   demonstrating  this (also considering  the difficulty in carrying out such studies), but it is reasonable to assume that we what has been observed in in vitro practice can also be attributed to clinical practice [37].

 

5. CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF  THE SAF

Guidelines for use of the SAF can be drawn up, based on observations reported by studies on the instrument mechanics[10,12].

Like with other NiTi instruments, an initial glide path has to be performed  using  a rotary #20.04, such relatively small diameter and small taper instruments has been recently shown not to produce microcraks even in curved canals (Kfir et al 2015)[39]. Afterwards  it is suggested to insert the SAF manually into the canal, paying attention to any possible obstacles  that might prevent the file  from reaching the working length (WL) previously estimated.

At this point, we can assemble the SAF  on the handpiece and start  canal shaping treatment, which will last for four minutes, as recommended

The choice of  a SAF diameter has to be made according to the original canal diameter. For canals with diameter sizes up  to 30-35,   a  1.5mm  SAF can be used, for  35 canal diameter size and over,  a  2.0mm SAF is recommended.  The procedure itself is very simple  but, unfortunately, it often underlies incorrect interpretations of  comparative results  between  SAF and Ni-Ti rotary instruments. Indeed, there are several studies asserting that the SAF procedure turns out to be comparable to  others in terms of cleaning, but a more careful reading, shows that 1.5 wide  SAF instruments are often used in these studies in wide canals  with apex  diameter sizes bigger than 35.

Throughout a 4 minute treatment,  irrigants (hypochlorite first,  then EDTA), perform their action continuously, and eventually enable us  to simply calculate the final gauging and then proceed to the final cone test.

Since it is no longer necessary to think in terms of predetermined tapers, we are obliged to test either different tapered  or non-standardized cones , in order to find the one that best fits the canal, or, as clearly shown by Metzger, to choose “customized” cones for a single canal, especially when encountering oval-shaped canals with remodelled  or extremely tapered apices.

Because of a  close coupling between the cone and the walls, which are not carved by  a file blades, but  are much smoother, the amount of cement required is minimal. All obturation procedures,  from cold lateral condensation to hot vertical condensation, either carrier- based or not  (Thermafill), have been analyzed in literature, and they have all shown  percentages of contact between gutta and canal walls, higher than average (Fig 14) [33,34]

Fig. 14 - Adapted from Metzger et Al

Fig. 14 – Adapted from Metzger et Al

Thanks to  its characteristics,  the use of the SAF is recommended for any dental practice. It is certainly  fundamental in oval-shaped canal treatment; however, considering the possibility of saving  root tissue and moderating   internal forces exerted in canal  roots, we definitely prefer them to conventional NI-Ti instruments

 

6. CLINICAL CASES

This photo  shows how the SAF respects to the best the anatomy of the drop-shaped entrances of the upper premolar, while cleaning the isthmus.

sefg.001

 

rhe.001

 

 

 

pasted-image-66

 

 

pasted-image-64

pasted-image-62

 

 

pasted-image-70

 

pasted-image-68

The synergistic use of the SAF and  rotary instruments(Pro-Taper®) , has been analyzed in order to demonstrate its effectiveness   in re-treatment.

It has been showed [26] that  the action of  rotary instruments only is not effective enough to remove all the remaining gutta from canals, whereas  the SAF (used afterwards) is able to remove and detach the remaining material more easily from the areas which do not come in contact with the rotary instrument, owing to it structural limitations.

profileprotaper.001

ultra saf.001

7.  CONCLUSION

To date, it is not  possible to  treat  a root canal in a predictable way, due to the many variables encountered and ,above all, we are not able to clean and disinfect it completely yet. There are still several issues to  solve in order to make endodontics  a discipline with definite results, but with the SAF  we have certainly taken  a great step forward with regard to the objective of  root canal therapy;  and  this change of direction will be able to  lay the foundations of  the evolution of  future endodontic therapy.

This procedure requires a natural learning curve, also due to the fact that we operate using a very flexible and delicate instrument, likely to be damaged, if not properly handled. That is why, even operators with experience in endodontics, will have to be personally instructed and trained in order to re-adjust their tactile sensitivity and their former habits in order to achieve expected result from this procedure.

Video n° 1 and 2 are for courtesy of ReDent Nova®, Israel

 

Bibliographical

Molander A, Caplan D, Bergenholtz, Reit C. Improved quality of root fillings provided by general dental practitioners educated in Ni-Ti rotary instrumentation. Int Endod J 2007;40:254-60

Al-Hadlaq SM, Aljarbou FA, alThumairy RI. Evaluation of cyclic flexural fatigue of Mwire Ni-Ti rotary instruments. J Endod 2010;36:305-307

Bier CA, Shemesh H, Tanomaru-Filho M, Wesselink PR, Wu MK. The ability of different Ni-Ti rotary instruments to induce dentinal damage during canal preparation. J Endod 2009;35:236,238

De Deus G, GurgelFilho ED, Magalhaes KM, Coutinho-Filho T. A laboratory analisys of gutta percha filled area obtained using thermafil, system-b and lateral condensation. Int Endod J 2006;39:378-83

De Deus G, Reis C, Beznos D, de Abranches AM, Coutinho-Filho T, Pacionrik S. Limited ability of three commonly used thermoplasticized gutta-percha. J Endod 2012;38:846-9

Shemesh H, Bier CA, Wu MK, TanomaruFilho M, Wesselink PR. The effects of canalpreparation and filling on the incidence of dentinal defects. Int J Endod 2009;42:208-13

Peters OA, Boessler C, Paqué F. Root canal preparation with a novel Ni-Ti instrument evaluated with micro tomography: Canal surface preparation over time. J Endod 2010;36:1068-72

Adorno GC, Yoshioka T, Suda H. Crack iniriation on the apical root surface caused by three different Ni-Ti rotary files at different working lengths. J Endod 2011;37:522-5

Yoldas O, Yilmaz S, Atakan G, Kuden C, Kasan Z. Dentinal microcrak formation during root canal preparation by different Ni-Ti rotary instruments and Saf. J Endod 2012;38:232-5

Metzeger Z, Teperovich E, Zary R, Cohen R, Hof R. The Self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 1:Respecting the root canal anatomy—a new concept of endodontic files and its implementation. J Endod 2010;36:679-90

Metzeger Z, Kfir A, Abramovitz I, Weissman A, Solomonov M. The Self-Adjusting-File system. Endo (Lond Eng) 2013;7:189-210

Hof R, Perevalov V, Eltanani M,Zary R, Metzeger Z. The SAF part2:Mechanical analisys. J Endod 2010;36:691-6

Peters OA, Paqué F. Root canal preparation of maxillary molars with SAF: A micro-computed tomography study. J Endod 2011;37:53-7

Paqué F, Ganahl D, Peters OA. Effects of root canal preparation on apical geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography. J Endod 2009;35:1056-59

Nielsen BA, Baumgartner J. Comparison of the Endo Vac System to needle irrigation of the canals. J Endod 2007;33:611-5

Shin SJ, Kim HK, Jung IY, Lee CY, Lee SJ, Kim E. Comparison of the clinical efficacy of a new apiece negative pressure irrigating system with conventional irrigation needles in the root canal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathology Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:479-84

de Gregorio  C, Arias A, Navarrete N, Del Rio V, Oltra E, Cohenca N.Effect of apical size and taper on volume of irigant delivered at working length with apical negativ pressure at different root curvature. J Endod 2013;39:119-24

Kunert GG, Camargo Fontanella VR, de Moura AA, Barletta FB. Analisys of apical root trasportation  associated with Pro taper universal F3 and F4instruments by using digital subtraction radiology. J Endod 2010;36:1052-5

Kim HC, Lee MH, Yum J, Versius A, Lee CJ, Kim BM. Potential relationship  between  design of rotary Ni-Ti instruments and verticl root fracture. J Endod 2010;36:1195-9

Metzeger Z, Taperovich E, Coeh R, Zary R, Paqué F, Hulsmann M. The SAF part 3:removal of debris and smear layer-a scanning electron microscope study. J Endod 2010;36:697-702

Metzeger Z, Solomonov M, Kfir A. The role of mechanical instrumentation in the cleaning of root canals. Ended Topics 2013;29:87-109

Adiguzel O,YigitOzer S, Kaya S, Uysal I, Ganidauli-Ayas S, Akkus Z. Effectivenessof EDTA and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a SAF. Oral Surg Oral MEd Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;112:803-8

Peters OA, Petrs CI, Shonenberger K, Barbakow F. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: Effects of canal anatomy on final shape analysed by micro CT. Int Endod J 2003;36:86,92

Paqué F, Ballmer M, Attin T, Peters OA. Preparatinj of oval-shaped root canals in mandibular molars using Ni-Ti rotary instruments: A micro-computed tomography study. J Endod 2010;36:703-7

Paqué F, Peters OA. Micro computed tomography evaluation of the preparation of long oval root canals in mandibular molars with SAF. J Endod 2011;37:517-21

Solomonov M,Paqué F, Kaya S, Adiguzel O, Kfir A, Yigit-Ozer S. SAF in retreatment. A hight resolution micro-computed tomography study. J Endod 2012;45:386-92

Shemesh H, Roeleveld AC, Wesselink PR, Wu MK. Damage to root dentin during  retreatment procedures. J Endod 2013;39:172-5

Versiani MA, Leoni GB, Steier L, De-Deus G, Tassani S, Pécora JD, et al. Micro-computed tomography study of oval shaped canals prepared with the SAF, Reciproc, WaveOne and ProTaper Universal Systems. J Endod 2013;39:1060-6

Solomonov M, Paqué F, Fan B, Eilat Y, Berman LH. The challenge of C-Shaped canal systems: A comparative study of the SAF and ProTaper. J Endod 2012;38-209-14

Paqué F, Laib A, Gautschi H, Zehnder M. Hard tissue drebris accumulation analisys by high resolution computed tomography scan. J Endod 2009;35:1044-7

Paqué F, Boessler C, Zehender M. Accumlated hard tissue debris levels in mesial roots of ,mandibular molars after sequential irrigation steps. Int Endod J 2011;44:148-53

Siquera JF jr, Alves FR, Almeida BM, de Oliveira JC, Rocas IN. Ability of chemiomechanical preparation with either rotary instruments or SAF to disinfect oval-shaped root canals. J Endod 2010;36:1860-5

Metzeger Z, Zary R, Cohen R, Taperovich E, Paqué F. The quality of root canal preparation and root canal obturation in canal treated with rotary versus SAF: A three dimensional micro-computed tomographic study. J Endod 2010;36:1569-73

De-DEus G, Barino B, Marins J, Magalhaes K, Thuanne E, Kfir A. SAF cleaning and shaping irrigation system optimizes the filling of oval shaped canals with thermoplasticized utta-percha. J Endod 2012;38:846-9

Lin J, Shen Y, Haapasalo M. A comparative study of biofilm removal with hand, rotary Ni-TI , and SAF instrumentation using a novel in vitro biofilm model. J Endod 2013;39:658-63

Wilcox LR, Roskelley C, Sutton. The relationship of root canal enlargement to finger spreader induced vertical root fracture. J Endod 1997;23:533-4

Metzger Z. The Self Adjusting File System: An evidence-based update. J Conserve Dent 2014;17:401-19

Kfir A.,Goldberg T,Koren T., Pawar A.M., Abramovitz I :Can size 20.04 taper rotary files reproducibily create a glide path fot the SAF? An ex-vivo study in MB canals of mandibular molars

The Self-Adjusting-File (SAF) Technique ultima modifica: 2015-06-01T15:49:55+00:00 da Francesco Bellucci

No Comments

Leave a Comment

Please be polite. We appreciate that.
Your email address will not be published and required fields are marked